Institution-ready feedback at scale

Give every student consistent, rubric-true feedback without burning out your faculty.

Nitpick powers schools and universities with AI that honors your curriculum, accessibility requirements, and audit needs - so instructors stay in control and students know exactly how to improve.

Educators using Nitpick

Book a pilot

Standardize great feedback for every class

Nitpick gives schools, districts, and universities a single platform to deliver rubric-true grading, guided learning plans, and transparent reporting - so teams can support more students without sacrificing quality.

What teams get

  • Rubric-driven scoring and feedback that matches your syllabus, program, and academic level.
  • Personal Learning Plans that adapt difficulty, pace, and priorities as students improve.
  • Accessibility accommodations and formatting adjustments built-in for disabilities and learning differences.
  • Cohort insights and early-risk alerts so staff can intervene before learners stall.
  • Reusable tasks and rubric templates to keep reviewers aligned and onboarding fast.

How Nitpick fits into your program

Upload

Connect your standards and rubric.

Upload the assessment, rubric, and examples (PDF, DOCX, or text).

Nitpick anchors every review to those requirements - no "generic AI" answers.

Grade with accommodations built-in.

We generate structured, rubric-true feedback and scores, apply disability accommodations, and keep a standard version for audit. Faculty stay in control of the final call.

Feedback
Feedback

Deliver actionable next steps.

Students see feedback that matches your standards plus a Personal Learning Plan.

  • Scores and comments per rubric dimension
  • Access-friendly formatting for ADHD, dyslexia, autism, and more
  • Targeted practice tasks and milestones to close gaps
example-documents

Why institutions choose Nitpick

Purpose-built for academic programs - consistent grading, accessibility support, and the oversight your teams need.

Rubric-true and auditable

Every review is anchored to your syllabus and rubrics, with standard and accommodated versions logged for oversight.

Accessibility by default

Disability accommodations and formatting adjustments are built-in, so feedback stays fair and student-ready.

Insightful for faculty

Cohort dashboards, risk alerts, and progress trends keep instructors ahead of stalled learners.

Integrity-first

Nitpick never ghostwrites. We coach, we surface next steps, and we respect your academic integrity policies.

Academic integrity, not shortcuts

Designed for policies that protect students, educators, and institutions.

We do:

  • Align to your rubrics and academic integrity rules
  • Keep audit trails of standard vs. accommodated feedback
  • Support accessibility accommodations with transparent rationale

We don't

  • Ghostwrite or complete student work
  • Train external AI models on your data
  • Share student information with advertisers or third parties

Security and privacy that meet institutional standards

Nitpick treats student and faculty data with the same rigor you do - aligned to GDPR-style controls and ready for procurement reviews.

  • Encryption in transit and at rest, with access controls for staff and reviewers
  • No selling, renting, or training external models on your data
  • Strict separation of customer data with auditability for compliance reviews
  • Ready to pilot Nitpick?

    Bring rubric-true, accessible feedback to your next cohort. We'll help you launch in a week.

    FAQ

    Every review is tied to your rubric and assessment criteria, logged for audit, and designed to coach rather than ghostwrite. Students see feedback and next steps - never finished work.

    Yes. We capture disability flags, apply grading accommodations, and reformat feedback for accessibility (short paragraphs, simpler language, literal phrasing) so students get fair, usable guidance.

    Cohort dashboards show mastery, trends, and risk alerts. Faculty can compare standard and accommodated feedback versions and export summaries for stakeholders.

    Upload your rubric and assessment template and invite a pilot class. Teams typically start reviewing drafts within days using existing materials.

    No. Nitpick accelerates high-quality feedback and flags where to intervene. Instructors remain in control of standards, overrides, and final grading.